Public housing, subsidized renters, etc. should be taught how to maintain and repair thier units
Secretary Donovan told Congress, "My many years of experience in dealing with affordable housing on a large scale—both in New York and overseeing HUD's multifamily assisted housing programs during the 1990's—have drilled home two key lessons. First, it is far more costly to build new units than to preserve 2 existing affordable housing. And, second, an affordable housing project can limp along for some time with piecemeal, ...more »
Secretary Donovan told Congress, "My many years of experience in dealing with affordable housing on a large scale—both in New York and overseeing HUD's multifamily assisted housing programs during the 1990's—have drilled home two key lessons. First, it is far more costly to build new units than to preserve
2
existing affordable housing. And, second, an affordable housing project can limp along for some time with piecemeal, ad hoc strategies to address its accumulating capital backlog, but eventually the building will reach a 'tipping point' where its deterioration becomes rapid, increasingly expensive to remedy, and often irreversible."
How many millions of dollars could be saved if physically-able residents of public housing, subsidized rental units, etc. were taught more effectively how to maintain and repair minor physical problems? Our existing stock of developments might not then need to be demolished and rebuilt at the taxpayer's repeated expense. The private-public ownership would benefit from lower costs in maintenance and project managers, and the already incentivized REAC scores would be higher, earning the project less frequent HUD insepctions, allowing more time for HUD staff to work on other issues.
« less full details »

